inlustre monumentum est

~ An Antipodean View on Classical Greece, Rome & the Mediterranean.

inlustre monumentum est

Category Archives: Roman history

To write the thing is to conquer it

22 Monday Apr 2013

Posted by scot mcphee in Latin Classics, Roman history

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Cicero, de provinciis consularibus, latin, literature

Cicero, de Provinciis Consularibus X.25, Piso doesn’t send letters, Gabinius sends them but they are damned, but Caesar’s letters (one presumes) earn him honours as altogether no other man:

vos enim, ad quos litteras L. Piso de suis rebus non audet mittere, qui Gabini litteras insigni quadam nota atque ignominia nova condemnastis, C. Caesari supplicationes decrevistis numero ut nemini uno ex bello, honore ut omnino nemini (Cic. Prov. X.25).

In fact you, to whom L. Piso does not dare to send letters concerning his affairs, you who condemned the letters of Gabinius, with a certain extraordinary censure, and novel dishonour, you voted supplications to C. Caesar, in number as no man, in one war honour as altogether no other.

Later, in XIII.33, we find that a region (Gaul) formerly not known through letters, not even through rumour (fama), has now been tramped all over by Caesar’s army:

… et quas regiones quasque gentis nullae nobis antea litterae, nulla vox, nulla fama notas fecerat, has hoster imperator nosterque exercitus et populi Romana arma peragrarunt. (Cic. Prov. XIII.33)

… and of those regions and those nations, no letters, no voice, no report had before made note to us, these were traversed over by our commander, our army, and by the arms of the Roman people.

And as we know, famously written on by the man himself:

Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres … (Caesar, de Bello Gallico 1.1.1)

The whole of Gaul is divided into three parts …

Men of the city, lock up your wives!

03 Sunday Feb 2013

Posted by scot mcphee in Latin Classics, Roman history

≈ Comments Off

Tags

Caesar, Suetonius, triumph

And so the solider’s sang, at Julius Caesar’s triumph over Gaul:

urbani, seruate uxores: moechum caluom adducimus. aurum in Gallia effutuisti, hic sumpsisti mutuum

Men of the city, lock up your wives: we bring the hairless fucker! The gold in Gaul you fucked away, here you procured the loot!

Suetonius, Jul. 51

How much would an average Roman have known about their history?

08 Saturday Dec 2012

Posted by scot mcphee in Classical history, Literature, Roman history

≈ Comments Off

Tags

Ariminum, Cicero, Flaminius, history, Rome, Varro

Recently, writing my paper for ASCS 34 this January I was confronted with the question How much did the average Roman citizen know about their own history?

Walking along, say a major road built 200 years before, would an average Roman citizen of the late Republic and early Empire have known about the person who built the road? Would they know who Flaminius was? His name was on the main road north out of Rome and all the up through Italy to Ariminum (the borderland of Roman territory when he built it in 220 B.C.). Augustus personally undertook its restoration, strategically it was an important road. But its builder died in a famous battle (Trasimene) only a few years thereafter. What sort of education was necessary before they would know? Obviously Cicero and Varro knew who he was but these are men famed for being knowledgeable and erudite. What about your average citizen?

I find this question is almost unanswerable. Does anyone have an opinion?

RIB inscription find locations at Chesters (and elsewhere) from @perlineamvalli

04 Sunday Nov 2012

Posted by scot mcphee in Ancient Religion, Archaeology, Personal, Roman history

≈ Comments Off

Tags

inscriptions, military, Roman Britain, Roman empire

Via @perlineamvalli comes this interesting set of mapping data for the RIB (Roman Inscriptions of Britain) that have been found at Chesters Roman Fort along wall mile 27:


View PLV Inscriptions (Chesters) in a larger map

You can find much more data for many inscriptions found along Hadrian’s Wall at the blog perlineamvalli.wordpress.com – there are great maps and colour-coding as to the precision of the known location of each inscription.[1]

Now the reason this is of particular interest to me is that some years ago now, when I was doing my Master’s degree, I wrote a paper analysing the location of the inscriptions in the RIB classified by deity name. Now I didn’t have the time, resources, or luxury to research to exactly where every inscription was found, so instead I used the county listed in the RIB as an approximate guide to the location, plus any general information I could glean from papers where the inscriptions were either the subject or incidentally, but authoritatively mentioned.

Initially I was looking for patterns in male/female deity distribution, but the major thing I stumbled upon was that the Jupiter inscriptions (along with inscriptions to the imperial genius, &c.) are all mainly found in the region of the wall (generally northern, “military” areas). Whereas inscriptions to Mars especially (this includes the syncretic agglomerations of Mars and other gods which seems to occur more frequently in the RIB than for Jupiter, excluding that were explicitly imperial cult) are in the main found in the southern “civilian” areas. In fact if you turned up an altar with an inscription in Gloucestershire (just to pick a southern county not quite randomly) my guess it would most likely be either to Mars or Mercury (or one in a smaller but still significant group of rather miscellaneous deities). Jupiter is nearly always up in the north (although this may be biased by large and distinct groups of altars to Iupitter Optimus Maximus that seem to have been buried in or near forts on the wall for reasons not quite clear to me).

Now this might be entirely unremarkable except for the fact I kept turning up assertions in the literature that indicated the opposite was occurring in Gaul; i.e. that Mars was a distinctly “military” deity with Jupiter being the “Romanising”[2] god that civilians preferred to pick for local syncretion. So there’s some process of local adaption going on beyond the differences often noted between the Greek East and the Gallic Western/Northern parts of the Empire.

This was my only real venture into any sort of archaeological data analysis, something you’d think I’d be good at given my computer science background, but after dabbling in it for a semester I rather abandoned that type of research for a more literary-historiographical focus for both my Masters dissertation and now my PhD thesis.[3]

[1]. This tweet also confirms that the entire dataset will be available from perlineamvalli.org.uk

[2]. Scare quotes deliberate. This is a loaded and highly contested term which I’m just going to hand-wave away for the purposes of this blog post.

[3]. In the main because my institution doesn’t have a lot of ways it could support such a research focus; also I’ve always been drawn to the classical literature first and foremost.

Plebs: the sitcom

04 Sunday Nov 2012

Posted by scot mcphee in Reception, Roman history

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

British, British TV, entertainment, modern life is rubbish, Roman empire, television, TV

I kid you not! From The Independent newspaper — a six part sitcom called Plebs will air on British TV next year (northern Spring). When I first saw the headline I immediately thought of those so-rubbish-they’re-almost-good British 1970s shows like Bless This House, Are You Being Served?, or On The Busses (no, that one’s just plain rubbish), but apparently not:

The much-loved classicist Mary Beard continues to conquer the airwaves, this time as an advisor on Plebs, a new sitcom set in Ancient Rome.

They are comparing it The Inbetweeners (in togas), which doesn’t help me as I’ve never seen that show (just its ads, which were unappealing to me), but here’s a more useful (for me, anyway) log line:

“The idea was to make the historical setting by-the-by and root it in modern concerns. We wanted to stay away from the clichés of camp silliness or austere classical actors,” says [the writer] … “Tonally, it’s much more Seinfeld than Up Pompeii.”

Seinfeld? In Rome? That could be … erm … interesting.

A Roman Emperor Sojourns at the Getty Villa | The Getty Iris

30 Tuesday Oct 2012

Posted by scot mcphee in Archaeology, Art & Art History, Roman history

≈ Comments Off

This lovely two metre high bronze statue of Tiberius from Herculaneum is currently in the Getty Villa museum undergoing conservation and investigative work:

Read all about its fascinating story in A Roman Emperor Sojourns at the Getty Villa.

ASCS 34 paper

15 Monday Oct 2012

Posted by scot mcphee in Academia, Latin Classics, Personal, Roman history

≈ Comments Off

Tags

conference, Flaminius, Livy, nebula, paper, Trasimene

My offer of a paper for ASCS 34 (Australasian Society for Classical Studies) next year (January 2013, in Sydney) was accepted. They were blind reviewed. Here is the abstract:

The Seen and the Unseen: Perception and Authority in Livy’s Battle Narratives

At the battle of the Trasimene Lake in 217 B.C., the consul C. Flaminius led his army into a fog that arose from the lake, which obscured their vision of Hannibal’s army lying in ambush. This paper will examine a number of aspects in Livy’s representation of Flaminius and the defeat at Trasimene in conjunction with Feldherr’s (Feldherr 1998) ideas surrounding the spectator and the spectacular. Taken as a whole, the episodes explored in this paper will show that Livy did not set out simply to denigrate Flaminius by repeating the opinions of sources hostile to him, but to have him fulfil an important role in a thought-provoking exemplum about the exercise and the visible representation of power. The paper will link Flaminius’ nebulous perception of the natural world around him to his own invisibility in the Roman civil ceremonies that should have marked his investiture as consul and departure to command the army. It will also explore the theme of sound versus sight in the human perception of battle. It will show the connections between the rational mind of ‘autopsy’ and the irrational emotions which only hear the dissonant clamour of the invisible enemy, in the battle of Trasimene, Hannibal’s crossing of the Alps, and the sack of Rome by the Gauls in the 4th century B.C. as it appears in book 5.

There’s also some additional points I’d like to make about the “invisibility” of Flaminius at Trasimene and in Rome, but I’m leaving those as surprises in the paper.

A new Classics blog: futurusessay

14 Sunday Oct 2012

Posted by scot mcphee in Academia, Classics resources, Digital Classics, Greek Classics, Greek history, Latin Classics, Personal, Roman history

≈ Comments Off

Tags

blog, futurusessay, uq

A PhD colleague and friend in the Classics department at UQ, has started a Classics blog called futurusessay – a nice play on the Latin for ‘about to be’. he blogs under the moniker ‘Futurus’. Go there and read it!

In our time – Hannibal

13 Saturday Oct 2012

Posted by scot mcphee in Academia, Digital Classics, Latin Classics, Roman history

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

audio, bbc radio 4, carthaginian, Hannibal, podcast, radio, Second Punic War

Next week (Friday 19 Oct) I’m giving my PhD confirmation seminar paper: Treachery Worse Than Punic: Livy’s Landscape and Hannibal’s Invasion of Italy. It examines the way that Livy draws the representation of the Italian landscape in the Second Punic War, in particular in Hannibal’s crossing of the Alps and the battles of the Trebia and Lake Trasimene.

Just in time for my paper next week comes an excellent overview of Hannibal and his career by Melvyn Bragg who does the “In Our Time” program on BBC4. It’s a program I can’t recommend highly enough: it’s always eclectic and interesting. This program won’t be contain any new information to most Classicists, especially Romanists or anyone who has read Polybius or Livy’s third decade, but it’s well worth the entertaining 43 minutes for a good overview of the Carthaginian general for the layman or anyone needing a refresher. There’s a bit at the end about his reception in the modern world too.

In our Time – Hannibal

Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss the life and achievements of Hannibal. One of the most celebrated military leaders in history, Hannibal was the Carthaginian general who led an entire army, complete with elephants, across the Alps in order to attack the Roman Republic. He lived at a time of prolonged hostility between the two great Mediterranean powers, Rome and Carthage, and was the Carthaginians’ inspirational leader during the Second Punic War which unfolded between 218 and 202 BC. His career ended in defeat and exile, but he achieved such fame that even his enemies the Romans erected statues of him. Centuries later his tactical genius was admired and studied by generals including Napoleon and Wellington.

With: Ellen O’Gorman, Senior Lecturer in Classics at the University of Bristol; Mark Woolmer, Senior Tutor in the Department of Classics and Ancient History at the University of Durham; Louis Rawlings, Senior Lecturer in Ancient History at Cardiff University.

Getty Villa (review)

29 Saturday Sep 2012

Posted by scot mcphee in Archaeology, Art & Art History, Classical history, Classics resources, Greek Classics, Greek history, Latin Classics, Roman history

≈ Comments Off

Tags

antiquities, getty villa, los angeles, museums, review

I reviewed the Getty Villa on Yelp. Although I have given it 4 out of 5 stars it I have two critiques of its collection from a professional standpoint, namely:

I think the Villa itself could be put to better use than as a merely beautiful container for the objects. The villa, being a replica Roman villa, could be better used to explained Roman social customs. The first thing to point out is the owner of the original villa was the Roman equivalent of J. Paul Getty: a very rich man. The structure of the Roman familia could be discussed; the roles of the paterfamilias, his wife and children, and the household slaves. It could go into the daily routine of the Roman household, etc. It could also be used to explain how Greek models of cultured life penetrated Roman life, for example, in the form of the peristyle garden. It also could at least have one interior room with the actual interior decoration of a Roman villa; rather than the heavily Georgian-period block colour models that it follows.

Last, I am not sure of the layout of the collection. Museum studies isn’t my area of expertise, on reflection I am sure that the thematic grouping of the objects could be improved. For example, in amongst the portraits (divided into men and women) there are a jumble of portrait heads and funerary monuments, Greek and Roman, with no explanation of the difference between burial practices and their evolution over time, and the social role of the portrait busts and monumental statues. I also had minor issues with some inscription translations put onto the cards.

Does anyone think these are unfair criticisms?

← Older posts

♣ Pages

  • About
  • LatinOWL

♣ Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

♣

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

♣ Archive

  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (5)
  • March 2013 (2)
  • February 2013 (2)
  • January 2013 (1)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (5)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (3)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • May 2012 (2)
  • April 2012 (10)
  • March 2012 (6)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (21)
  • December 2011 (18)
  • November 2011 (61)
  • October 2011 (8)

♣ Classics resources

  • APA
  • ASCS
  • Bryn Mawr Classical Review
  • Classical Association
  • JACT
  • Lacus Curtius
  • Metis
  • Perseus
  • Pleiades

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.